Zambrano

Zambrano v. Golding

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20214:19-cv-03332-HSGCalifornia4,771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN CARLOS ZAMBRANO, Case No. 19-cv-03332-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; REQUIRING

v. RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF

ERIC GOLDING, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is a summary judgment motion filed by defendants Golding, Blakely, Olsen, Thomas, Yang, Nasr and Kumar (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 34. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 48, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 49. DISCUSSION I. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, discovery and affidavits show there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (2014). Material facts are those that may affect the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.