Zambrano
Zambrano v. Golding
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN CARLOS ZAMBRANO, Case No. 19-cv-03332-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; REQUIRING
v. RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF
ERIC GOLDING, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 34 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is a summary judgment motion filed by defendants Golding, Blakely, Olsen, Thomas, Yang, Nasr and Kumar (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 34. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 48, and Defendants have filed a reply, Dkt. No. 49. DISCUSSION I. Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, discovery and affidavits show there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (2014). Material facts are those that may affect the…