Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20213:21-cv-04554California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 21-cv-04554-WHO (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, Dkt. No. 8 Respondent.

12 After petitioner Jose Antonio Rodriguez filed an incomplete habeas application, the Clerk sent him a notice directing him to file a complete application, along with another habeas application and instructions for completing the application. (Dkt. No. 4.) Rodriguez filed a second petition, but this one fails to correct the deficiencies in the first. (Dkt. No. 7.) Neither petition stated any facts, let alone such crucial information as the (i) date, terms, and the court of sentencing; and (ii) grounds for challenging his detention. Also, Rodriguez’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) is incomplete — it lacks a prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. (Dkt. No. 8.) He was sent a Clerk’s Notice regarding this deficiency, but failed to correct it. (Dkt. No. 6.) Accordingly, this federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.