Threde
Threde v. Brandrep LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYLVIA SCHICK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03013-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET
v. ASIDE DEFAULT
BRANDREP LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendant.
12 On April 26, 2021, plaintiffs filed the instant action. On April 29, 2021, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 6. Defendant BrandRep, LLC (“BrandRep”) was served on July 15, 2021, placing its deadline to respond to the FAC as August 5, 2021. Dkt. No. 28 at 11 (Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Default). August 5, 2021 came and went without defendant BrandRep filing a response to the FAC; the clerk issued a notice of entry of default on August 10, 2021. Id.; Dkt. No. 29. On August 17, 2021, BrandRep filed the instant motion to set aside default arguing its counsel mistakenly believed plaintiffs granted him an extension of time to respond to the FAC while the parties met and conferred about a potential motion to dismiss, a motion to…