Tradeshift, Inc. v. BuyerQuest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20213:20-cv-01294California6,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRADESHIFT, INC.,

Case No. 20-cv-01294-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE BUYERQUEST, INC., et al., ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE; GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. COMPLAINT AND LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER; DENYING

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; AND DENYING

MOTIONS TO SEAL AND

EVIDENTIARY MOTIONS

I. INTRODUCTION This order deals with a cavalcade of motions brought by Tradeshift and BuyerQuest. First, Tradeshift seeks relief from the magistrate judge’s order denying them discovery on a breach of contract theory that was not pled in its complaint. In the alternative, Tradeshift moves to amend its complaint to reflect its new confidentiality breach theory. BuyerQuest, for its part, seeks to amend …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.