Bennett

Bennett v. AT&T Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20214:20-cv-03581California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YOLONDA BENNETT, Case No. 20-cv-03581-JST (SK)

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION v. TO QUASH AND TO COMPEL

AT&T SERVICES, INC., Regarding Docket Nos. 65, Defendant.

The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief on September 14, 2021. In the letter brief, Plaintiff moves to quash the subpoenas issued to her medical providers. (Dkt. Nos. 65, 67.) Defendant issued six subpoenas to medical providers for Plaintiff: three to Sutter entities in different locations, one to a medical doctor, one to Stanford, and one to a dentist. (Dkt. No. 67.) The subpoenas seek comprehensive records regarding Plaintiff’s history of medical conditions, testing, and billing, dating back to January 1, 2017, a year and a half before Defendant terminated Plaintiff’s employment. Plaintiff claims that she has suffered nausea, sleep deprivation, elevated blood pressure, nosebleeds, bruxism, TMJ, permanent tinnitus, severe migraines,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.