Masuda
Masuda v. Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 EMILY MASUDA, Case No. 20-cv-09389-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. REMAND
LUCILE SALTER PACKARD [Re: ECF No. 16] CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, et al.,
Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Emily Masuda brings this putative class action against Defendants Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, Stanford Health Care, and Stanford Health Care Advantage (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). See ECF No. 1-1, Exhibit B (“Compl.”). Defendants removed this action to this Court, alleging federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. See ECF No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand to state court, in which Plaintiff argues that she lacks Article III standing to bring this claim in federal court. See ECF No. 16 (“Mot.” or “Motion”). Defendants oppose the Motion, arguing…