Minor

Minor v. Baker Mills, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20213:20-cv-02901California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHERRIS MINOR,

Case No. 20-cv-02901-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED BRIEF BAKER MILLS, INC., et al., 13 Defendants.

15 In connection with their opposition to plaintiff’s motion for class certification, defendants filed two separate motions to exclude the reports and opinions of three of plaintiff’s experts, and a separate document objecting to a fourth expert’s declaration. The two motions expressly invoke Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) as a basis for excluding the expert opinions; the objection does not refer to Daubert but similarly challenges the reliability of the expert’s opinions. After the opposition, the motions, and the objection were filed, plaintiff contacted defendants to object that the motions and the objections violate Civil Local Rule 7-3, which provides that “[a]ny evidentiary and procedural objections to the motion must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.