Quiroz

Quiroz v. ADS-Myers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20213:20-cv-01755California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JENNY QUIROZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01755-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 31 ADS-MYERS, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 Two motions are pending in this putative class action lawsuit against defendants ADS- MYERS, Inc., and Karoline Myers (collectively, ADS) for alleged violations of federal and California state wage and hour laws. ADS asked to compel arbitration of named plaintiff Jenny Quiroz’s claims pursuant to an arbitration agreement in an employment contract. Dkt. No. 32. That motion raised contract formation questions requiring a bench trial. See Dkt. No. 39. The Court will file shortly the findings of fact and conclusions of law for the bench trial. This order resolves ADS’s motion to dismiss the claims of named plaintiff Brayan Barrios under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Dkt. No. 31-1. Barrios is not said to have signed a contract with an arbitration agreement, and so the arbitration order will affect only Quiroz and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.