Brickman

Brickman v. Facebook, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20213:16-cv-00751California273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 COLIN R. BRICKMAN, Case No. 16-cv-00751-WHO Plaintiff,

ORDER RE JUDGMENT

Vv. FACEBOOK, INC., ll Defendant. I have reviewed the Joint Report On Meet-And-Confer Efforts (Dkt. No. 153) following || my September 15, 2021 order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended |} complaint (Dkt. No. 152). In that order, I assumed the truth of the existing allegations in || plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and the additional allegations in his proposed Second a || Amended Complaint, and considered the Declaration of Randall A. Snyder (Dkt. No. 133-1). The 17 || parties were on notice that I would test plaintiffs existing and proposed allegations regarding defendant’s conduct under Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163, 1164 (2021). Dkt. No. 132. || Having determined that plaintiffs existing and proposed allegations were not sufficient as a matter 20 || of law, I denied as futile plaintiffs motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.