Amazon.com, Inc. v. Sleja, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20214:20-cv-07405California7,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMAZON.COM, INC., Case No. 20-cv-07405-PJH (JSC)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

v. RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

EXPERT TECH ROGERS PVT. LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 11 Defendants.

12 Amazon.com, Inc. alleges that nine Defendants perpetrated a fraudulent scheme infringing on its trademarks. (Dkt. No. 1.) The Clerk entered default against two Defendants, Swatanter Gupta and Expert Tech Rogers Pvt. Ltd. (“ETR”), on February 11, 2021 after they failed to appear or otherwise defend against this matter. (Dkt. Nos. 29, 31.) Amazon now moves for default judgment against Mr. Gupta and ETR pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (Dkt. No. 39.) District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton referred the motion to the undersigned for a report and recommendation. (Dkt. No. 48.) After carefully considering the motion, which is unopposed, and supporting documents, the Court concludes that oral argument is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.