Card

Card v. Ralph Lauren Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20213:18-cv-02553California5,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 VICTORIA CARD, Case No. 18-cv-02553-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 148 Defendants.

13 Victoria Card sues the Ralph Lauren Corporation, Ralph Lauren Company West, LLC, and E.J Victor Inc (Defendants) for their May 2015 termination of a business relationship.1 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is now pending before the Court. (Dkt. No. 148.2) After carefully considering the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the September 29, 2021 hearing date, and GRANTS the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not identified evidence sufficient to create a genuine dispute of fact regarding her contract-based claims or her Robinson-Patman Act claim; Defendants are therefore entitled to judgment on these claims as a matter of law. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.