Love

Love v. Barcelino Continental Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20213:19-cv-06684California1,423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 19-cv-06684-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

BARCELINO CONTINENTAL CORP., Re: Dkt. No. 48 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Barcelino Continental Corp.’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Dkt. No. 48.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the September 30, 2021 hearing, and DENIES the motion for the reasons explained below. BACKGROUND Samuel Love brought claims for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the California Unruh Act, seeking injunctive relief and statutory damages. (Dkt. No. 1 at 4–7.) He alleged that Defendant, a clothing store, failed to provide accessible sales counters and accessible writing surfaces, thus committing an act of discrimination the basis of disability in …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.