Quiroz

Quiroz v. ADS-Myers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:20-cv-01755California3,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JENNY QUIROZ, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01755-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE ARBITRATION AND

v. FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE

ADS-MYERS, INC., et al., CONTRACT FORMATION Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Jenny Quiroz and Brayan Martinez Barrios, on behalf of themselves and a 13 putative class of similarly situated employees, have sued ADS-Myers, Inc., and its founder and 14 chief executive officer, Karoline Myers (together, ADS), for claims under the Fair Labor 15 Standards Act (FLSA), the California Labor Code, the Unfair Competition Law, and Private 16 Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Dkt. No. 30 (Second Amended Complaint). ADS provides 17 janitorial services, and Quiroz and Barrios are said to have worked for it in 2019. 18 The Court denied a motion to dismiss directed at Barrios because fact disputes about his 19 employment status were not suitable for decision in a pleadings motion. See Dkt No. 62. This 20 order resolves ADS’s motion to compel arbitration of Quiroz’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.