Neela

Neela v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20215:19-cv-04682California6,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 N.N., Case No. 19-cv-04682-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN

v. PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 18,

14 15 Plaintiff N.N.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 16 (“Commissioner”)2 denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 423, et seq. The essential question on appeal is whether the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) properly evaluated the medical evidence and N.N.’s subjective testimony regarding her symptoms in assessing N.N.’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”), such that the ALJ’s conclusion that N.N. is capable of working and is not disabled is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.