Sharma

Sharma v. Mann

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20215:21-cv-00480California1,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MILAP SHARMA, Case No. 21-cv-00480-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY

CLOSING CASE

BALWINDER SINGH MANN, AMARJIT KAUR MANN, and MANN LIQUORS dba [Re: ECF 20] M & M LIQUORS,

Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Milap Sharma (“Sharma”) alleges that Defendants Balwinder Singh Mann (“Balwinder”) and Amarjit Kaur Mann (“Amarjit”) held him against his will and forced him to work in their liquor store, Defendant Mann Liquors, Inc. dba M & M Liquors (“M & M”). The operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) asserts sixteen claims against Defendants, including violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1595, violation of California labor laws, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and related claims. See FAC, ECF 6. Defendants move to stay this action pending the resolution of state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.