In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20213:20-cv-03131California3,428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 IN RE CALIFORNIA GASOLINE SPOT Case No. 20-cv-03131-JSC

MARKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

FOR LACK OF PERSONAL

JURISDICTION

11 Dkt. Nos. 263, 294, 306, 310, 320, 322, 332

13 Plaintiffs allege that Defendants entered into horizonal agreements to restrain competition 14 in the spot market for gasoline and gasoline blending components formulated for use in California. 15 Plaintiffs bring state antitrust and unjust enrichment claims against SK Trading International Co., 16 Ltd. (“SK Trading”), SK Energy Americas, Inc. (“SK Energy”), Vitol Inc. (“Vitol”), and two 17 individual defendants.1 The Court previously deferred ruling on SK Trading’s motion to dismiss 18 for lack of personal jurisdiction and allowed Plaintiffs to conduct jurisdictional discovery. (Dkt. 19 No. 263.) That discovery is complete and the parties have submitted supplemental briefing. (Dkt. 20 Nos. 294, 306, 310, 320, 322, 332.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and having had 21 the benefit of oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.