McMillion
McMillion v. Rash Curtis & Associates
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 Case No. 4:16-cv-03396-YGR
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PROPOSED
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDS, INCLUDING AN AWARD OF
IGNACIO PEREZ, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES
AND SERVICE AWARD FOR THE CLASS
Plaintiff, REPRESENTATIVE v. Re: Dkt. No. 451
RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, Defendant.
The context of this action is well-known. To summarize, following a one-week trial, a jury 14 found in favor of plaintiff Ignacio Perez, individually, and the class members, and against 15 defendant Rash Curtis & Associates (“Rash Curtis”), awarding over $267 million (“Perez I”). The 16 size of the award was the result of a mathematical calculation assessing statutory damages of $500 17 for each call made in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. sections 227, 18 et seq. (the “TCPA”).1 19 With such an obviously enormous award, at the close of trial, the Court…