Bailey

Bailey v. LinkedIn Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20215:20-cv-05704California1,449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 Case No. 5:20-cv-05704-EJD

IN RE LINKEDIN ERISA LITIGATION ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

10 Re: Dkt. No. 89

13 Plaintiffs Douglas Bailey, Jason Hayes, and Marianne Robinson filed this putative class action against Defendants LinkedIn Corporation, LinkedIn Corporation’s Board of Directors (“the Board”), LinkedIn Corporation’s 401(k) Committee (“the Committee”), and Does 1-20 who are members of the Board or Committee or are otherwise fiduciaries of the LinkedIn Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (“the Plan”), alleging violation of fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. Dkt. No. 1. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 89. Having considered the parties’ briefing, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.