Kellman
Kellman v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division SHOSHA KELLMAN, Case No. 17-cv-06584-LB
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON PARTIES’ JOINT
v. DISCOVERY LETTER
WHOLE FOODS MARKET Re: ECF No. 182 CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The parties to the above-captioned case brief two “sub-issues” in their joint letter. First, to what extent the defendants (WF) may redact non-responsive and irrelevant information from their productions, and, second, whether WF has sufficiently described a select number of documents which were redacted or withheld for attorney-client privilege or work product privilege.1 The court finds WF may not redact, only withhold, documents for non-responsive information and orders WF to submit an updated privilege log consistent with the court’s orders below. 24 25 26 27 1 Joint Letter – ECF No. 182 at 1. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (ECF); …