Vines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PARIS DONTE VINES, Case No. 21-cv-00827-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN PART AND

v. SERVICE IN PART

KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Docket No. 6 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Paris Donte Vines alleges his Eighth Amendment rights were violated by officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”) and California Institute for Men (“CIM”), executives at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), and a court-appointed federal receiver. The Court screened Mr. Vines’s original complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). See Docket No. 10. Mr. Vines’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). See Docket No. 6. Mr. Vines has stated a cognizable claim for violation of the Eighth Amendment. The Court directs Defendants to respond to the FAC with a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such…