Lindblad

Lindblad v. SalesForce

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20214:21-cv-07432California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division ROBERT M. LINDBLAD, Case No. 3:21-cv-7432-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

SALESFORCE, Re: ECF No. 1 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Lindblad, who represents himself and is proceeding in forma pauperis, sued Salesforce, claiming that the defendant owes him $110,000.1 Before directing the United States Marshal to serve the defendant with the complaint, the court must screen it for minimal legal viability. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The plaintiff has not plausibly pleaded a federal claim. In this order, the court identifies the complaint’s deficiencies and gives the plaintiff an opportunity to amend the complaint by October 25, 2021 to cure them. 24 25 26 27 1 Compl. – ECF No. 1 at 4, 8. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (ECF); pinpoint …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.