Wag Hotels, Inc. v. Wag Labs, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 WAG HOTELS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01326-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

ANSWER AND SCHEDULING ORDER

WAG LABS, INC., [Re: ECF No. 29] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims and to Amend Scheduling Order. ECF No. 29 (“Mot.”). The Motion is unopposed. ECF No. 30. The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion for leave to file a second amended answer, and GRANTS Defendant’s motion for leave to amend the scheduling order, as modified below. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, a party seeking to amend a scheduling order or to amend a pleading past the deadline set by a scheduling order must show “good cause” for such relief. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.”). If…