Loggervale

Loggervale v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20213:20-cv-04679California4,698 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AASYLEI LOGGERVALE, AASYLEI HARDGE-LOGGERVALE, and AAOTTAE LOGGERVALE, No. C 20-04679 WHA

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STEVEN

HOLLAND, MONICA POPE, KEITH

LEEPER, ANTHONY DESOUSA, CAMERON GALLOWAY, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants.

18 INTRODUCTION In this Section 1983 action for unlawful conduct by sheriffs’ deputies, defendants move for summary judgment on almost all claims. Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment on the unlawfulness of the searches and seizures. To the extent stated below, both sides’ motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. STATEMENT The following facts are uncontroverted. In the morning of September 20, 2019, plaintiffs Aasylei Loggervale (Ms. Loggervale), Aasylei Hodge-Loggervale (Aasylei), and Aaottae Loggervale (Aaottae), parked at a Starbucks in Castro Valley, California. Aaottae,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.