Klein

Klein v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20213:20-cv-08570California1,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MAXIMILIAN KLEIN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-08570-LHK (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

v. DISPUTE RE PLAINTIFFS' INITIAL

DISCLOSURES

FACEBOOK, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 156 Defendant.

13 The Advertiser Plaintiffs1 and the Consumer Plaintiffs2 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding the sufficiency of Plaintiffs’ Rule 26(a) initial disclosures regarding computation of damages. Dkt. No. 156. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without a hearing. See Civil L.R. 7- 1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that the Consumer Plaintiffs must supplement their initial disclosures, but the Advertiser Plaintiffs need not. I. BACKGROUND Facebook contends that Plaintiffs have not disclosed the amount or method for computing damages or the documents or evidence on which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.