Scott Crawford v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT CRAWFORD,
Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS Plaintiffs, 17 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 19 Defendants.
21 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are three people using motorized wheelchairs who asked Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary Rasier, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” or “Uber”) to provide wheelchair-accessible vehicle (“WAV”) service (“UberWAV”) in their home cities of New Orleans, Louisiana and Jackson, Mississippi. After Uber declined, Plaintiffs brought this suit accusing Uber of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). subsection 42…