Poole
Poole v. Garland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KAIRE POOLE, Case No. 20-cv-09379-PJH Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.
13 Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) came on for hearing before this court on October 14, 2021. Plaintiff appeared through her counsel, Michael Hawbecker. Defendant appeared through his counsel, Kenneth Brakebill. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion, for the reasons stated at the hearing. As noted at the hearing, “Title VII provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment.” McGee v. Dejoy, 821 F.App’x 860, 861 (9th Cir. 2020) (citing White v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 652 F.2d 913, 916-17 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820,…