Lindblad
Lindblad v. Walgreens Corporations
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT LINDBLAD, Case No. 21-cv-07507-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
v. EXPERT FEES AND LAB WORK
COSTS
WALGREENS CORPORATIONS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Robert Lindblad, who has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, brings this case against Defendants Walgreens Corporations, Starbucks Coffee, and Arapahoe County Government, alleging a conspiracy exists to deprive him of his civil rights. On October 18, 2021, he filed a request that the Court “pay costs for lab work to further entrench the conviction of the plaintiff, that there is the illegal poisonous substance strychnine in the cotton-balls and the Starbucks Coffee the plaintiff has possession of as proof of the allegations.” ECF No. 9. Lindblad also requests the Court pay for “an expert sustain strengthened standing to sue.” “[T]he expenditure of public funds on behalf of an indigent litigant is proper only when …