Cornejo

Cornejo v. Tumlin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20213:20-cv-05813California4,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MARIMAR CORNEJO et al., Case No. 20-cv-05813-CRB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'

MOTIONS TO DISMISS SECOND

JEFFREY TUMLIN et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants.

In February of 2021, the Court granted in part and dismissed in part motions to dismiss by various defendants in this case, which stems from the towing of pro se Plaintiffs Marimar Cornejo and Jamil Bey’s 1998 Toyota Camry in February of 2020. See Order Dismissing (dkt. 32). The Court dismissed some claims with prejudice—including the state law claims, the Fourth Amendment claim against Defendant the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), the Fourteenth Amendment claim against all defendants, and the section 1985 claim against Defendants AutoReturn, Alvah, and PG&E. Id. at 19. The Court dismissed with leave to amend Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim against Defendants Alvah and P&E, instructing Plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.