Ellis

Ellis v. State of California Franchise Tax Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20214:21-cv-06175California1,367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL E. ELLIS, Case No. 21-cv-06175-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 12 11 Defendant.

12 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by Defendant State of California Franchise Tax Board (“FTD”). In response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff Michael E. Ellis (“Plaintiff”) appearing pro se, filed a motion to strike the motion. (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff also filed a response to the reply and opposition. (Dkt. No. 15.) The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, and it finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.