Hutt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01292-HSG (JD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE JUDICIAL

v. DISQUALIFICATION

NANCY HUTT, et al., Defendants.

12 Pro se plaintiff Shu filed a request to disqualify Judge Gilliam under 28 U.S.C. § 455 from presiding over this case and another action, Case No. 20-cv-06537-HSG. Dkt. No. 16. The Court has written extensively about the standards of Section 455 and allied provisions. See Nat’l Abortion Fed’n v. Ctr. for Med. Progress, 257 F. Supp. 3d 1084 (N.D. Cal. 2017); Sanai v. Kozinski, No. 19-cv-08162-YGR (JD), 2021 WL 2273982 (N.D. Cal. May 24, 2021). These decisions are incorporated here by reference. In pertinent part, motions under Section 455 “are determined by the judge to whom the motion is directed.” Nat’l Abortion Fed’n, 257 F. Supp. 3d at 1088 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and United States v. Sibla, 624 F.2d 864, 867-68 (9th Cir. 1980)); see also Sanai, 2021 WL 2273982, at *2 (Section 455…