Robbins

Robbins v. PlushCare, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20213:21-cv-03444California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH ROBBINS, Case No. 21-cv-03444-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND;

PLUSHCARE, INC., et al., DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants PlushCare, Inc. and PlushCare of California, Inc., A.P.C.'s (collectively, "PlushCare") Motion to Dismiss, filed August 23, 2021, whereby PlushCare seeks dismissal of plaintiff Sarah Robbins' ("Robbins") First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Robbins has filed opposition, to which PlushCare has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows:1 1. The Second Cause of Action,2 by which Robbins asserts that PlushCare, in violation of § 17200 of the Business and Professions Code, has engaged in unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent practices, is subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.