Bush

Bush v. Walensky

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20214:21-cv-05825California1,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 *NOT FOR PUBLICATION* 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM DAVID BUSH, Case No. 4:21-cv-05825-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER

v. DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

ROCHELLE WALENSKY, ET AL., Re: Dkt. Nos. 6, 9 Defendants.

12 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 6, Report and Recommendation, “Report”) recommending dismissal of this case with prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e). Plaintiff objected to the Report. (Dkt. No. 9.) The Court has reviewed the Report and objection carefully and issues the following decision: Magistrate Judge Spero’s Report is correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and the Court ADOPTS it in every respect. Magistrate Judge Spero granted Mr. Bush’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and subsequently reviewed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.