Lindblad

Lindblad v. Han Lin Auction Gallery

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20213:21-cv-07548California1,434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT LINDBLAD, Case No. 21-cv-07548-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

HAN LIN AUCTION GALLERY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendants.

12 The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (Dkt. No. 4.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiff’s claims do not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, the Court gives Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS The complaint alleges a real estate dispute over property located at 39-49 El Camino Real in Millbrae, California. (Dkt. No. 1 at 4.) Plaintiff is a resident of San Francisco. He names four Defendant entities: Han Lin Auction Gallery, located at 39 El Camino Real; Chien Lung Antiques, located at the same address; Han Lin Auction Gallery, located at a different address of 66 21st Avenue in San Mateo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.