Bradshaw

Bradshaw v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20214:20-cv-03340California7,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNE B.,

Case No. 20-cv-03340-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 26 Defendant.

Plaintiff Anne B. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. For the reasons stated below, the court denies Plaintiff’s motion and grants the Commissioner’s motion. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits on December 11, 2017, alleging disability beginning on March 1, 2006. Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 232-52, 259. Her application was initially denied on May 2, 2018 and again on …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.