Flanigan
Flanigan v. Harris, Hicklin and Tam
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIE M. FLANIGAN, Plaintiff, No. C 16-00066 WHA
v.
HOLDER, et al., ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS
FOR RELIEF AND DIRECTING
Defendants.
STATUS CHECK
15 16 Pro se plaintiff Willie M. Flanigan filed a number of letters that the Court construes as motions for various forms of relief (Dkt. Nos. 197, 198, 202, 205, 206, 207, 209, 210, 213). The latest summary judgment order herein detailed our facts (Dkt. No. 191). In short, after a high-speed vehicle chase through downtown San Francisco ended in a multi-car crash, San Francisco police forcibly removed plaintiff from his car. The pre-custody force exerted by the officers to subdue him stayed within constitutional confines, but whether the alleged post- custody force transgressed constitutional limits remains a live claim post-summary judgment to be decided by a jury. 1. PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR RELIEF. Plaintiff’s current motions are suitable for disposition on…