Maslic

Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20215:21-cv-02556California7,187 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SASA MASLIC, et al., Case No. 21-CV-02556-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

v.

MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 21 17 On April 8, 2021, Defendants Eisenmann Corporation and Tesla, Inc. removed this putative class action from the Superior Court for the County of Alameda asserting federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d)(2), 1453. See ECF No. 1 (“Notice of Removal”). ECF No. 8. The plaintiffs in this matter—Saša Maslic, Ivan Drzaic, Robert Hernaus, Leopold Hubek, Leon Hudoldetnjak, Elvis Koscak, Tomica Panic, Stjepan Papes, Željko Puljko, Darko Štante, Nedeljko Živani, Gogo Rebic, and Mitja Pogorevc (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)—are fourteen employees of ISM Vuzem d.o.o., ISM Vuzem USA, Inc., Vuzem…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.