Richman
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Richman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 21-cv-01911-CRB(LB)
COMMISSION,
12 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER 13 v. Re: ECF No. 51 14 JESSICA RICHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 INTRODUCTION The parties dispute three subpoenas served by the SEC on Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, and Fidelity Brokerage Services. The subpoenas seek the defendants’ bank and investment information, which the SEC asserts is related to the defendants’ alleged securities fraud. The defendant moved to quash the subpoenas generally contending that they are irrelevant and duplicative.1 The court can decide the issues without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7-1(b). The court finds that the subpoenas are relevant, denies the motion to quash, and orders the production of the records. 25 26 27 1 Joint Letter Br. – ECF No. 51. Citations refer to material in the Electronic Case File (ECF); pinpoint …