Paulette R. Navarro v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20213:20-cv-04950California6,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAULETTE N.,

Case No. 20-cv-04950-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW M. SAUL, JUDGMENT

10 Defendant. Regarding Docket Nos. 16, 23

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiff Paulette N.’s motion for summary judgment and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16- 5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having carefully considered the administrative record, the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment for the reasons set forth below. The Court REMANDS this action for further proceedings. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.