Paulette R. Navarro v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PAULETTE N.,
Case No. 20-cv-04950-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER REGARDING CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
ANDREW M. SAUL, JUDGMENT
10 Defendant. Regarding Docket Nos. 16, 23
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiff Paulette N.’s motion for summary judgment and the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16- 5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having carefully considered the administrative record, the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment for the reasons set forth below. The Court REMANDS this action for further proceedings. …