IN RE: S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC. WINDEX NON-TOXIC LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20214:20-cv-03184California1,638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC. Case No. 20-cv-03184-HSG

WINDEX NON-TOXIC LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

9 Re: Dkt. No. 64 This Document Relates To: All Actions

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.’s motion to stay this action pending final approval of the class settlement in Clark v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., Case No. RG20067897 in Alameda Superior Court (“Clark”). Dkt. No. 64. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, and the Court only briefly summarizes them here as relevant to the pending motion to stay. Plaintiffs Michelle Moran and Monica Waddell filed these consolidated actions against Defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., alleging that it uses false and misleading labels representing that certain of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.