Fox

Fox v. Uribe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20215:18-cv-07221-BLFCalifornia6,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD JAMES FOX,

Case No. 18-07221 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

T. URIBE, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 33)

17 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical personnel at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The amended complaint is the operative complaint in this action. Dkt. No. 15. Finding the amended complaint stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, the Court ordered service upon Defendants. Dkt. No. 16. Defendants Dr. Nguyen, Dr. K. Kumar, and Dr. B Brizendine filed a motion for

25 1 All page references herein are to the Docket pages shown in the header to each document and brief cited, unless otherwise indicated.

2 A deliberate indifference to safety claim was dismissed for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.