Magee

Magee v. Cantil-Sakauye

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20213:21-cv-05432California1,421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RUCHELL C. MAGEE, Case No. 21-cv-05432-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

RECUSE THE UNDERSIGNED

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al., Dkt. No. 2 Defendants.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ruchell Cinque Magee is barred from bringing this action in forma pauperis because he has filed at least three federal actions that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or on grounds that they failed to state a claim for relief. He was ordered to show cause why pauper status should not be barred, but his response is insufficient to show that pauper status should not be denied. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Magee bringing his claims in a new paid complaint. DISCUSSION i. Pauper Status Plaintiff Ruchell Cinque Magee, a state prisoner and frequent litigant in federal court, has filed this federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.