Nagle

Nagle v. York

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20215:20-cv-08482California1,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID F. NAGLE, Case No. 20-cv-08482-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE OCTOBER 20, 2021

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

THOMAS A. YORK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendants.

13 The parties dispute whether defendant Thomas York should be permitted to withdraw his deemed admissions and amend his responses with respect to plaintiff David Nagle’s Requests for Admissions (“RFAs”) Nos. 3-6. Dkt. No. 29. The Court held a hearing on this dispute on October 26, 2021. For the reasons explained below, the Court will permit Mr. York to withdraw his deemed admissions but will re-open discovery and permit Mr. Nagle to take Mr. York’s deposition. I. BACKGROUND On April 26, 2021, Mr. Nagle served several RFAs on Mr. York. Dkt. No. 26, Ex. A. The Court previously concluded that Mr. York did not timely respond to the RFAs and they are now deemed admitted under Rule 36(a) of the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.