Caiman Consulting v. Infosys Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20215:18-cv-00807California4,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CC LIT HOLDING, LLC, Case No. 18-cv-00807-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART

INFOSYS LIMITED, AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Re: ECF Nos. 42, 43]

13 This case concerns the business relationship between Plaintiff CC Lit Holding, LLC (“Caiman”) and Defendant Infosys Limited (“Infosys”). In 2006, Caiman presented Infosys with an opportunity to work with Cavium, a third party, which was in the process of integrating a company it had just acquired. Caiman alleges that it disclosed the opportunity to Infosys with the reasonable expectation of receiving a finder’s fee for the referral. After Cavium selected Infosys to assist with the integration, Caiman sought payment of a finder’s fee, but Infosys refused. This suit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.