Rubalcava

Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20215:20-cv-04191California647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; AND VACATING

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., HEARING ON MOTION Defendants. [Re: ECF 110]

12 This order addresses Plaintiff Lionel Rubalcava’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. See Mot. for Leave, ECF 110. The Court finds the motion to be suitable for decision without oral argument and therefore the hearing set for January 6, 2022 is VACATED. The motion is GRANTED for the reasons discussed below. Rubalcava seeks leave to file an amended complaint to correct errors recently discovered by his counsel and to omit certain parties and claims in light of the Court’s prior order addressing Defendants’ motions to dismiss. The proposed amended complaint omits seven Defendants, including the County of Santa Clara and six individual San Jose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.