Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Lakeshore 76, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 20214:20-cv-04635California6,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 20-cv-04635-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

LAKESHORE 76, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendants.

Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda is an individual with a disability. He filed this lawsuit against Defendants Lakeshore 76, Inc., Sam Ng, and Wendy Ng (collectively, “Lakeshore”) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and related state laws. Sepulveda now moves for summary judgment, or “in the alternative, for an order treating specified facts as established.” Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Mot.”) [Docket No. 40.] Lakeshore filed an opposition (“Opp’n”), and Sepulveda replied (“Reply”). [Docket Nos. 43, 45.] The court finds that this motion may be resolved on the papers without a hearing. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Sepulveda’s motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND Sepulveda is an individual with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.