Turner

Turner v. Alberto

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20213:20-cv-02980California1,082 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDELL LOWELL JAMES TURNER, Case No. 3:20-cv-02980-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO VACATE

v. AND MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

ADALBERTO ALBERTO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 47, 50, 58 Defendants.

12 This is a case brought by pro se plaintiff Randell Turner against several individuals and the City of Union City. Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Turner originally filed in state court alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. Defendants timely removed to federal court after Turner filed and served his Second Amended Complaint. Id. Following removal, Turner moved to remand to the California Superior Court of Alameda, Dkt. No. 13, and defendants moved to dismiss the case, Dkt. No. 20. The Court denied a remand and granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 43. In lieu of amending his complaint (and later filing a declaration to stand on the original complaint, Dkt. No. 49), Turner appealed to the Ninth Circuit,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.