DeZure

DeZure v. The American Board of Pediatrics, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20215:20-cv-09123California2,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CHANDANI DEZURE, Case No. 20-cv-09123-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

THE AMERICAN BOARD OF

PEDIATRICS, INC., Re: ECF 38 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Dr. Chandani DeZure alleges that Defendant the American Board of Pediatrics discriminated against her when it refused to allow her to sit for a board certification examination because she failed to meet ABP’s hours prerequisite. DeZure claims that she was unable to meet the hours requirement because she was pregnant during the relevant period. The Court dismissed the first amended complaint (FAC) with leave to amend, finding that ABP is not subject to the Fair Employment and Housing Act and DeZure did not sufficiently allege retaliation under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. DeZure filed a second amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.