Manrique

Manrique v. O'Keefe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20213:21-cv-08395California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division ALEJANDRO TOLEDO MANRIQUE, Case No. 21-cv-08395-LB

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: ECF No.

DONALD O’KEEFE, United States Marshal for the Northern District of California, 15 Respondent. 16 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Alejandro Toledo Manrique — the former President of Peru — filed this habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging a certification of his extraditability to Peru, where he is accused of collusion and money laundering. (Pet. – ECF No. 1.) This order requires the respondent to respond to the petition. ANALYSIS “An extradition may be challenged by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal court.” Gonzalez v. O’Keefe, No. C 12-2681 LHK, 2014 WL 6065880, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2014). (citing Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U.S. 80 (1885) & Prasoprat v. Benov, 421 F.3d 1009, 1013 (9th Cir. 2005)).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.