Strojnik

Strojnik v. R.F. Weichert V, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20215:20-cv-00354California6,274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PETER STROJNIK, Case No. 20-cv-00354-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

R.F. WEICHERT V, INC., SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

13 Pending before the Court is plaintiff Peter Strojnik’s proposed Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 39), which the Court has construed as a motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading. Dkt. No. 40. Defendant R.F. Weichert V, Inc. (“Weichert”) opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 41. Although given an opportunity to do so, Mr. Strojnik did not file a reply. The matter is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. Dkt. No. 40; Civil L.R. 7- 1(b). For the reasons discussed below, Mr. Strojnik’s motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading is granted in part and denied in part.1 I. BACKGROUND Mr. Strojnik filed this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.