Twitter, Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20213:21-cv-02769California9,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

TWITTER, INC., Case No. 21-CV-02769-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 25 VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) brings the instant case against Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“Defendant”) seeking a declaratory judgment that Twitter’s products do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,935,872 (“the ’872 patent”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant moves to dismiss the instant case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and improper venue. ECF No. 25. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Over the past five years, Defendant has litigated numerous cases involving a family of patents that relate to methods and systems for communicating over an internet protocol (“IP”) network. See VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.